| | | | | | |

FX 9590 vs Core i3-10105


Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i3-10105 gets 195.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
a0653
Core
Vishera
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
220 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2013
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
253.93k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
16.11k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
24.12k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
5.71k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
7.89k (x1.1)
TOTAL
32.41k
53.83k (x1.66)

Multithread

9590

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
58.25k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
105.73k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
27.8k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.51k (x0.92)
TOTAL
137.65k
195.29k (x1.42)

Performance/W
9590
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
1627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
3004 points/W

Performance/GHz
9590
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4