FX 9590 vs Core M-5Y10c
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.7 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.7 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306d4
Core
Vishera
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
220 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2013
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
7.22k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
9.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
2.75k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
2.98k (x0.42)
TOTAL
32.41k
22.93k (x0.71)
Multithread
9590
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
15.07k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
24.8k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
6.68k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
4.46k (x1.17)
TOTAL
137.65k
51k (x0.37)
Performance/W
9590
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4