FX 9590 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
810f81
Core
Vishera
Picasso
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
220 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
168.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
13.05k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
22.88k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
5.39k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
7.31k (x1.02)
TOTAL
32.41k
48.63k (x1.5)
Multithread
9590
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
51.73k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
87.74k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
20.74k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
6.57k (x1.72)
TOTAL
137.65k
166.79k (x1.21)
Performance/W
9590
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
796 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
1350 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
2566 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3262 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5719 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
12157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4