| | | | | | |

FX 9590 vs 8350


Description
Both models 9590 and 8350 are based on Piledriver architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 9590 is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
600f20
Core
Vishera
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/8
TDP
220 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2013
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
118.14k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
9.85k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
8.41k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
3.58k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
6.32k (x0.88)
TOTAL
32.41k
28.16k (x0.87)

Multithread

9590

8350
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
44.93k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
45.21k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
22.81k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
5.19k (x1.36)
TOTAL
137.65k
118.14k (x0.86)

Performance/W
9590
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
945 points/W

Performance/GHz
9590
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4