FX 9590 vs Core i7-1165G7
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
806c1
Core
Vishera
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
220 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2013
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
210.4k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
16.27k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
25.74k (x2.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
11.5k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
10.82k (x1.51)
TOTAL
32.41k
64.32k (x1.98)
Multithread
9590
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
54k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
88.76k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
35.23k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
12.14k (x3.18)
TOTAL
137.65k
190.12k (x1.38)
Performance/W
9590
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
1928 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
3170 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
434 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
6790 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3462 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5476 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4