FX 8350 vs Core i5-9500T
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.8 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.8 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
906ea
Core
Vishera
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/6
TDP
125 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
October 2012
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
274.02k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
13.46k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
20.21k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.72k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
10.25k (x1.62)
TOTAL
28.16k
48.64k (x1.73)
Multithread
8350
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
74.65k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
110.86k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
22.08k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
4.12k (x0.79)
TOTAL
118.14k
211.7k (x1.79)
Performance/W
8350
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
2133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
3167 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
631 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
6049 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
5462 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
2771 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
13145 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4