| | | | | | |

FX 8350 vs Core i5-8250U


Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i5-8250U gets 137.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
806ea
Core
Vishera
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2012
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
54.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
161.26k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
12.59k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
18.89k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.65k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
8.2k (x1.3)
TOTAL
28.16k
44.32k (x1.57)

Multithread

8350

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
45.91k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
69.55k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
16.79k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
4.83k (x0.93)
TOTAL
118.14k
137.09k (x1.16)

Performance/W
8350
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
3061 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
4637 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
1120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
9139 points/W

Performance/GHz
8350
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
3702 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
5556 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
13036 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4