FX 8350 vs Core i5-2410M
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 3.1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 3.1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
206a7
Core
Vishera
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
125 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
38.68k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
7.38k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
6.76k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.3k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
2.66k (x0.42)
TOTAL
28.16k
20.1k (x0.71)
Multithread
8350
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
14.17k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
14.71k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
6.93k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
2.87k (x0.55)
TOTAL
118.14k
38.68k (x0.33)
Performance/W
8350
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
198 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
1105 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
2332 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
917 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4