FX 8350 vs 9590
Description
Both models 8350 and 9590 are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
600f20
Core
Vishera
Vishera
Base frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/8
TDP
125 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
11.51k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
9.57k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.19k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
7.14k (x1.13)
TOTAL
28.16k
32.41k (x1.15)
Multithread
8350
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
55.13k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
51.69k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
27.02k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
3.81k (x0.73)
TOTAL
118.14k
137.65k (x1.17)
Performance/W
8350
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4