FX 8350 vs A10 7700K
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 7700K is based on Steamroller.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the 7700K gets 57.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the 7700K gets 57.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
630f01
Core
Vishera
Kaveri
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2012
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
21.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
57.89k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
7.33k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
7.99k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
2.91k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
3.15k (x0.5)
TOTAL
28.16k
21.38k (x0.76)
Multithread
8350
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
23.06k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
20.11k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
10.44k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
4.28k (x0.82)
TOTAL
118.14k
57.89k (x0.49)
Performance/W
8350
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
212 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
609 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
1929 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
2101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
5625 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4