FX 8320 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.7 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 3.7 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
800f11
Core
Vishera
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2012
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.68k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
103.21k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5.35k
13.95k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
22.02k (x4.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.15k
5.17k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
16.61k (x4.11)
TOTAL
16.68k
57.75k (x3.46)
Multithread
8320
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
36.79k
120.59k (x3.28)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
197.34k (x4.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.57k
56.83k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
6.41k (x0.96)
TOTAL
103.21k
381.16k (x3.69)
Performance/W
8320
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
1855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
3036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
5864 points/W
Performance/GHz
8320
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
4490 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
15609 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4