| | | | | | |

FX 8320 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 8320 is 1.5 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
810f10
Core
Vishera
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2012
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
16.68k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
103.21k points
71.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.35k
11.54k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
19.69k (x3.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.15k
4.55k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
3.25k (x0.8)
TOTAL
16.68k
39.03k (x2.34)

Multithread

8320

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.79k
19.25k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
36.27k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.57k
10.2k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
3.07k (x0.46)
TOTAL
103.21k
68.8k (x0.67)

Performance/W
8320
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
4586 points/W

Performance/GHz
8320
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4