| | | | | | |

FX 8320 vs Core i5-1135G7


Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 148.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
806c1
Core
Vishera
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
16.68k points
69.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
103.21k points
262.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5.35k
15.2k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
23.46k (x4.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.15k
11.05k (x5.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
9.53k (x2.36)
TOTAL
16.68k
59.23k (x3.55)

Multithread

8320

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
36.79k
43.69k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
70.25k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.57k
28.48k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
6.24k (x0.94)
TOTAL
103.21k
148.66k (x1.44)

Performance/W
8320
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
1560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
2509 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
1017 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
223 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
5309 points/W

Performance/GHz
8320
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
3618 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
5585 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
2268 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
14103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4