| | | |

FX 6300 vs Core m7-6Y75


Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 57.1 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
406e3
Core
Vishera
Skylake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2012
September 2015

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
7166
10244 (42.95%)
Test#2 (FP)
7860
15330 (95.03%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2674
2967 (10.95%)
Test#1 (Memory)
5098
5316 (4.27%)
TOTAL
22798
33857 (48.51%)

Multithread

6300

m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
20902
16781 (-19.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
24644
25088 (1.80%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8765
6137 (-29.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2762
5576 (101.87%)
TOTAL
57072
53581 (-6.12%)

Performance/W
6300
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
259 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
601 points/W
13395 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2068 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
704 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1342 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
6000 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8