| | | |

FX 6300 vs Core i5-3470


Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-3470 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 57.1 k points while the i5-3470 gets 70.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3470 is 1.2 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
306a9
Core
Vishera
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2012
Jun 2012

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
7166
11390 (58.94%)
Test#2 (FP)
7860
11051 (40.60%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2674
4435 (65.84%)
Test#1 (Memory)
5098
4620 (-9.39%)
TOTAL
22798
31495 (38.15%)

Multithread

6300

i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
20902
28194 (34.89%)
Test#2 (FP)
24644
27042 (9.73%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8765
11070 (26.31%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2762
4312 (56.11%)
TOTAL
57072
70618 (23.73%)

Performance/W
6300
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
259 points/W
351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92 points/W
144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
601 points/W
917 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3164 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2068 points/GHz
3070 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
704 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1342 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
TOTAL
6000 points/GHz
8749 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8