| | | |

FX 6300 vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 57.1 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
406e3
Core
Vishera
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
November 2016

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
7166
7340 (2.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
7860
11367 (44.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2674
2743 (2.58%)
Test#1 (Memory)
5098
3080 (-39.59%)
TOTAL
22798
24529 (7.59%)

Multithread

6300

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
20902
15324 (-26.69%)
Test#2 (FP)
24644
25607 (3.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8765
6358 (-27.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2762
2583 (-6.47%)
TOTAL
57072
49872 (-12.62%)

Performance/W
6300
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
259 points/W
1707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
601 points/W
3325 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2068 points/GHz
5683 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
704 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1342 points/GHz
1540 points/GHz
TOTAL
6000 points/GHz
12265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8