FX 4100 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.3 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.3 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
406f1
Core
Zambezi
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2011
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
237.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
6.04k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
10.18k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.74k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
2.41k (x0.51)
TOTAL
22.18k
21.37k (x0.96)
Multithread
4100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
47.51k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
75.12k (x4.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
19.72k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
5.45k (x0.96)
TOTAL
44.31k
147.8k (x3.34)
Performance/W
4100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
1739 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4