| | | | | | |

FX 4100 vs Core m7-6Y75


Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.

Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.2 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f12
406e3
Core
Zambezi
Skylake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
53.58k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
10.24k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
15.33k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.97k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
5.32k (x1.12)
TOTAL
22.18k
33.86k (x1.53)

Multithread

4100

m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
16.78k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
25.09k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
6.14k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
5.58k (x0.98)
TOTAL
44.31k
53.58k (x1.21)

Performance/W
4100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
13395 points/W

Performance/GHz
4100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4