FX 4100 vs Core i7-4500U
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i7-4500U gets 53.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4500U is 1.2 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i7-4500U gets 53.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4500U is 1.2 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
40651
Core
Zambezi
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
66.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
10.41k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
8.97k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
3.82k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
3.39k (x0.71)
TOTAL
22.18k
26.59k (x1.2)
Multithread
4100
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
19.91k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
21.47k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
8.53k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
3.53k (x0.62)
TOTAL
44.31k
53.44k (x1.21)
Performance/W
4100
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
1327 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
1431 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
569 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
3563 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
8863 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4