FX 4100 vs Core i5-9500
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-9500 gets 268.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 6.1 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-9500 gets 268.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 6.1 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
906ea
Core
Zambezi
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
352.84k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
16.14k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
24.18k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
5.87k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
12.5k (x2.63)
TOTAL
22.18k
58.69k (x2.65)
Multithread
4100
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
92.21k (x5.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
137.92k (x9.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
33.12k (x4.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
5.56k (x0.98)
TOTAL
44.31k
268.8k (x6.07)
Performance/W
4100
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
1419 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
509 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
4135 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
5495 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
2842 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
13339 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4