FX 4100 vs Core i5-3570
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-3570 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-3570 gets 117.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3570 is 2.7 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-3570 gets 117.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3570 is 2.7 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
306a9
Core
Zambezi
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2011
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
35.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
117.91k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
12.72k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
12.18k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
4.86k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
5.25k (x1.1)
TOTAL
22.18k
35.01k (x1.58)
Multithread
4100
i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
48.14k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
45.87k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
18.16k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
5.75k (x1.01)
TOTAL
44.31k
117.91k (x2.66)
Performance/W
4100
i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
596 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
236 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
1531 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i5-3570
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
3206 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
1280 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
1381 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
9213 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4