| | | | | | |

FX 4100 vs Core M-5Y10c


Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.

Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.2 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f12
306d4
Core
Zambezi
Broadwell-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
51k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
7.22k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
9.98k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.75k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
2.98k (x0.63)
TOTAL
22.18k
22.93k (x1.03)

Multithread

4100

M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
15.07k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
24.8k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
6.68k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
4.46k (x0.79)
TOTAL
44.31k
51k (x1.15)

Performance/W
4100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
10200 points/W

Performance/GHz
4100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4