FX 4100 vs A4 6300B
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the 6300B is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4100 is 1.6 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4100 is 1.6 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
610f31
Core
Zambezi
Richland
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
October 2011
December 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
20.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
27.54k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
8.35k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
7.31k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.95k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
1.51k (x0.32)
TOTAL
22.18k
20.11k (x0.91)
Multithread
4100
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
10.88k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
10.01k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
5.02k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
1.63k (x0.29)
TOTAL
44.31k
27.54k (x0.62)
Performance/W
4100
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
167 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
154 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
77 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
2140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
1873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
756 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
387 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
5157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4