E1 2500 vs Core i5-3317U
Description
The 2500 is based on Jaguar architecture while the i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 4.5 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 4.5 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
306a9
Core
Kabini
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
15 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
6.64k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.13k points
41.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.35k
6.11k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
2.21k
6.58k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
2.48k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
2.71k (x3.23)
TOTAL
6.64k
17.88k (x2.69)
Multithread
2500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
13.67k (x4.15)
Test#2 (FP)
3.21k
16.8k (x5.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
6.66k (x3.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
4.17k (x4.8)
TOTAL
9.13k
41.31k (x4.52)
Performance/W
2500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
214 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
117 points/W
392 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
609 points/W
2430 points/W
Performance/GHz
2500
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
1679 points/GHz
2351 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1581 points/GHz
2532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points/GHz
953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
600 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
4745 points/GHz
6879 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4