E1 2500 vs Core i5-2467M
Description
The 2500 is based on Jaguar architecture while the i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the i5-2467M gets 29.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2467M is 3.3 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the i5-2467M gets 29.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2467M is 3.3 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
206a7
Core
Kabini
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.64k points
14.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.13k points
29.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2500
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.35k
5.4k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
2.21k
4.9k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
2.4k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
2.09k (x2.48)
TOTAL
6.64k
14.78k (x2.22)
Multithread
2500
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
11.67k (x3.54)
Test#2 (FP)
3.21k
10.74k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
5.09k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
2.28k (x2.63)
TOTAL
9.13k
29.78k (x3.26)
Performance/W
2500
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
686 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
214 points/W
632 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
117 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
609 points/W
1752 points/W
Performance/GHz
2500
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
1679 points/GHz
2347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1581 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points/GHz
1042 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
600 points/GHz
907 points/GHz
TOTAL
4745 points/GHz
6424 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4