E1 2500 vs A4 6300B
Description
The 2500 is based on Jaguar architecture while the 6300B is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300B is 3 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300B is 3 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
610f31
Core
Kabini
Richland
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
May 2013
December 2013
Mean monothread perf.
6.64k points
20.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.13k points
27.54k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2500
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
2.35k
8.35k (x3.55)
Test#2 (FP)
2.21k
7.31k (x3.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
2.95k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.51k (x1.8)
TOTAL
6.64k
20.11k (x3.03)
Multithread
2500
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
10.88k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
3.21k
10.01k (x3.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
5.02k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
1.63k (x1.87)
TOTAL
9.13k
27.54k (x3.02)
Performance/W
2500
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
167 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
214 points/W
154 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
117 points/W
77 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
609 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
2500
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
1679 points/GHz
2140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1581 points/GHz
1873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points/GHz
756 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
600 points/GHz
387 points/GHz
TOTAL
4745 points/GHz
5157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4