E Series E-450 vs Pentium T3400
Description
The E-450 is based on Bobcat architecture while the T3400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-450 gets a score of 9.7 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.5 times faster than the E-450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-450 gets a score of 9.7 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.5 times faster than the E-450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
6fd
Core
Zacate
Merom-2M
Base frecuency
1.65 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2011
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
6.51k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.65k points
14.91k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E-450
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
0.85k
1.86k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
2.47k
1.9k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.47k
1.42k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.7k
0.84k (x1.2)
TOTAL
5.49k
6.01k (x1.09)
Multithread
E-450
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
4.04k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
3.43k
4.17k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.32k
3.55k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
1.2k (x1.75)
TOTAL
7.68k
12.96k (x1.69)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-450
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.82k
2.49k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
2.57k
2.25k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.46k
2.17k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.14k (x1.72)
TOTAL
6.51k
8.05k (x1.24)
Multithread
E-450
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.16k
4.98k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
4.43k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.73k
4.27k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.58k
1.23k (x2.13)
TOTAL
9.65k
14.91k (x1.54)
Performance/W
E-450
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
176 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
233 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
536 points/W
426 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-450
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1557 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
883 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
401 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
3947 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4