E Series E-450 vs Core 2 Duo T6500
Description
The E-450 is based on Bobcat architecture while the T6500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-450 gets a score of 9.7 k points while the T6500 gets 9.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E-450 is 1.1 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-450 gets a score of 9.7 k points while the T6500 gets 9.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E-450 is 1.1 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
1067a
Core
Zacate
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
1.65 GHz
2.1 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
FC-PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.51k points
10.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.65k points
9.17k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E-450
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
0.85k
0.07k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
2.47k
3.11k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.47k
0.62k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.7k
1.02k (x1.46)
TOTAL
5.49k
4.82k (x0.88)
Multithread
E-450
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
1.2k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
3.43k
3.18k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.32k
1.53k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
1.21k (x1.77)
TOTAL
7.68k
7.12k (x0.93)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-450
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.82k
2.41k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
2.57k
5.31k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.46k
2.04k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.14k (x1.72)
TOTAL
6.51k
10.9k (x1.67)
Multithread
E-450
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.16k
1.81k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
4.55k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.73k
1.58k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.58k
1.23k (x2.13)
TOTAL
9.65k
9.17k (x0.95)
Performance/W
E-450
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
176 points/W
52 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
233 points/W
130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
45 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
536 points/W
262 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-450
T6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1557 points/GHz
2530 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
883 points/GHz
972 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
401 points/GHz
542 points/GHz
TOTAL
3947 points/GHz
5192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4