E Series E-450 vs Celeron N3150
Description
The E-450 is based on Bobcat architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-450 gets a score of 9.7 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 3.3 times faster than the E-450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-450 gets a score of 9.7 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 3.3 times faster than the E-450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
406c3
Core
Zacate
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.65 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.65 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
18 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2011
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
6.51k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.65k points
31.8k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E-450
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
0.85k
1.07k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
2.47k
1.74k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.47k
1.5k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.7k
1.46k (x2.1)
TOTAL
5.49k
5.78k (x1.05)
Multithread
E-450
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
3.99k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
3.43k
6.31k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.32k
5.05k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.65k (x3.86)
TOTAL
7.68k
18k (x2.34)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-450
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1.82k
3.91k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
2.57k
2.29k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.46k
1.57k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.44k (x2.18)
TOTAL
6.51k
9.21k (x1.41)
Multithread
E-450
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
3.16k
14.78k (x4.68)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
8.62k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.73k
5.84k (x3.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.58k
2.57k (x4.46)
TOTAL
9.65k
31.8k (x3.29)
Performance/W
E-450
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
176 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
233 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
536 points/W
5300 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-450
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1557 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
883 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
401 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
3947 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4