E Series E-350 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the E2180 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the E2180 gets 13.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E2180 is 1.4 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the E2180 gets 13.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E2180 is 1.4 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
6fd
Core
Zacate
Allendale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2011
August 2007
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
7.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
13.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E-350
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
0.83k
2.01k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
2.38k
2.01k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.02k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
1.07k (x1.43)
TOTAL
5.37k
7.1k (x1.32)
Multithread
E-350
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
1.45k
3.98k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
3.97k
3.99k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
4.01k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
1.08k (x1.32)
TOTAL
8.42k
13.06k (x1.55)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
2.31k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
2.08k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.1k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
1.06k (x1.43)
TOTAL
6.26k
7.55k (x1.21)
Multithread
E-350
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
4.57k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
4.11k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
4.14k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.07k (x1.18)
TOTAL
10.05k
13.89k (x1.38)
Performance/W
E-350
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
70 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
63 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
64 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
214 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
E2180
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
1042 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
3777 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4