E Series E-350 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the Q6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.1 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.1 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
6fb
Core
Zacate
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
18 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2011
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
2.78k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
2.49k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.37k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
1.29k (x1.74)
TOTAL
6.26k
8.92k (x1.43)
Multithread
E-350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
10.9k (x3.85)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
9.79k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
9.11k (x3.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
0.84k (x0.93)
TOTAL
10.05k
30.64k (x3.05)
Performance/W
E-350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4