E Series E-350 vs Core 2 Duo E6550
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the E6550 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6550 is 1.6 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6550 is 1.6 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
6fb
Core
Zacate
Conroe
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.333 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2011
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
10.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
16.38k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E-350
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
0.83k
2.34k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
2.38k
2.34k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.35k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
2.72k (x3.65)
TOTAL
5.37k
9.75k (x1.82)
Multithread
E-350
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1.45k
4.67k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
3.97k
4.68k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
4.71k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
1.26k (x1.54)
TOTAL
8.42k
15.32k (x1.82)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
2.7k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
2.43k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
2.44k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
2.74k (x3.68)
TOTAL
6.26k
10.31k (x1.65)
Multithread
E-350
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
5.39k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
4.85k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
4.89k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.26k (x1.4)
TOTAL
10.05k
16.38k (x1.63)
Performance/W
E-350
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
83 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
75 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
75 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
252 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
4417 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4