E Series E-350 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
30678
Core
Zacate
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2011
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
4.8k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
2.47k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
1.86k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
1.22k (x1.64)
TOTAL
6.26k
10.36k (x1.65)
Multithread
E-350
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
8.24k (x2.91)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
4.19k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
3.05k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.32k (x1.46)
TOTAL
10.05k
16.79k (x1.67)
Performance/W
E-350
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4