| | | | | | |

E Series E-350 vs Celeron J1900


Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.

Summarizing, the J1900 is 3.3 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
500f10
30679
Core
Zacate
Bay Trail-D
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
18 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
January 2011
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
33.25k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E-350
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
0.83k
1.24k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
2.38k
1.77k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
1.65k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
1.15k (x1.54)
TOTAL
5.37k
5.81k (x1.08)

Multithread

E-350

J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1.45k
4.68k (x3.23)
Test#2 (FP)
3.97k
6.67k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.18k
6.15k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
1.45k (x1.78)
TOTAL
8.42k
18.96k (x2.25)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
4.58k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
2.32k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
1.72k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
1.14k (x1.53)
TOTAL
6.26k
9.75k (x1.56)

Multithread

E-350

J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
17.16k (x6.05)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
8.42k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
6.22k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.44k (x1.61)
TOTAL
10.05k
33.25k (x3.31)

Performance/W
E-350
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
3325 points/W

Performance/GHz
E-350
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4