E Series E-350 vs Core Duo T2300
Description
The E-350 is based on Bobcat architecture while the T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.1 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E-350 gets a score of 10 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.1 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f10
6e8
Core
Zacate
Yonah
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.66 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
18 W
31 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2011
January 2006
Mean monothread perf.
6.26k points
5.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
10.05k points
9.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E-350
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
1.46k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
2.33k
1.63k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.41k
1.53k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.74k
0.96k (x1.29)
TOTAL
6.26k
5.58k (x0.89)
Multithread
E-350
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.84k
2.42k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
3.89k
2.95k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.42k
3k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.01k (x1.13)
TOTAL
10.05k
9.38k (x0.93)
Performance/W
E-350
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
158 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
216 points/W
95 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134 points/W
97 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
558 points/W
303 points/W
Performance/GHz
E-350
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1115 points/GHz
882 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1454 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
879 points/GHz
924 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
465 points/GHz
578 points/GHz
TOTAL
3914 points/GHz
3364 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4