C Series C-60 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the Q6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
6fb
Core
Ontario
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
9 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2011
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
2.78k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.49k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
2.37k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
1.29k (x2.85)
TOTAL
4.79k
8.92k (x1.86)
Multithread
C-60
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
10.9k (x4.62)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
9.79k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
9.11k (x4.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
0.84k (x1.15)
TOTAL
8.53k
30.64k (x3.59)
Performance/W
C-60
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4