C Series C-60 vs Core 2 Duo T7250
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the T7250 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the T7250 is 1.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the T7250 is 1.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
6fd
Core
Ontario
Merom
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
13.82k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
C-60
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
0.66k
1.96k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
2k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.11k
1.96k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.52k
1.22k (x2.37)
TOTAL
4.2k
7.14k (x1.7)
Multithread
C-60
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
0.89k
3.87k (x4.35)
Test#2 (FP)
2.67k
3.95k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
3.8k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.6k
1.34k (x2.25)
TOTAL
5.68k
12.96k (x2.28)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
2.27k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.07k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
2.01k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
1.22k (x2.69)
TOTAL
4.79k
7.57k (x1.58)
Multithread
C-60
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
4.51k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
4.09k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3.9k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
1.32k (x1.8)
TOTAL
8.53k
13.82k (x1.62)
Performance/W
C-60
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
395 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4