C Series C-60 vs Core 2 Duo E4400
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the E4400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the E4400 gets 14.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E4400 is 1.7 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the E4400 gets 14.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E4400 is 1.7 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
6fd
Core
Ontario
Allendale
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
7.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
14.17k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
C-60
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
0.66k
2.01k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
2.01k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.11k
2.02k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.52k
1.19k (x2.3)
TOTAL
4.2k
7.24k (x1.72)
Multithread
C-60
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
0.89k
4k (x4.49)
Test#2 (FP)
2.67k
4.02k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
4.04k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.6k
1.2k (x2.01)
TOTAL
5.68k
13.26k (x2.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
2.3k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.09k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
2.1k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
1.18k (x2.6)
TOTAL
4.79k
7.67k (x1.6)
Multithread
C-60
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
4.61k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
4.17k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
4.2k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
1.2k (x1.63)
TOTAL
8.53k
14.17k (x1.66)
Performance/W
C-60
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
71 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
64 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
65 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
218 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
591 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3834 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4