C Series C-60 vs Core i3-370M
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the i3-370M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 2.1 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 2.1 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
20655
Core
Ontario
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1 GHz
0.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
9 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
8.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
18.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
3.4k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.35k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
1.35k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
1.39k (x3.06)
TOTAL
4.79k
8.49k (x1.77)
Multithread
C-60
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
7.18k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
5.13k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3.5k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
2.33k (x3.18)
TOTAL
8.53k
18.15k (x2.13)
Performance/W
C-60
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
147 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
518 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
561 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3537 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4