| | | | | | |

C Series C-60 vs Celeron N3060


Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.

Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
500f20
406c4
Core
Ontario
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
August 2011
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
13.36k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
4.68k (x3.54)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.74k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
1.83k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
0.9k (x1.99)
TOTAL
4.79k
10.15k (x2.12)

Multithread

C-60

N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
6.31k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
3.68k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.46k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
0.91k (x1.24)
TOTAL
8.53k
13.36k (x1.57)

Performance/W
C-60
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
2227 points/W

Performance/GHz
C-60
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4