| | | | | | |

C Series C-60 vs Core Duo T2300


Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.

Summarizing, the T2300 is 1.1 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
500f20
6e8
Core
Ontario
Yonah
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.66 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
1.66 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
31 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
January 2006
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
5.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
9.38k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
1.46k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
1.63k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
1.53k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
0.96k (x2.11)
TOTAL
4.79k
5.58k (x1.17)

Multithread

C-60

T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.42k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
2.95k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
1.01k (x1.38)
TOTAL
8.53k
9.38k (x1.1)

Performance/W
C-60
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
95 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
97 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
303 points/W

Performance/GHz
C-60
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
882 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
924 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
578 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3364 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4