C Series C-60 vs E Series E-350
Description
Both models C-60 and E-350 are based on Bobcat architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.2 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.2 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
500f10
Core
Ontario
Zacate
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Date
August 2011
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
10.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
C-60
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
0.66k
0.83k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
2.38k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.11k
1.41k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.52k
0.75k (x1.44)
TOTAL
4.2k
5.37k (x1.28)
Multithread
C-60
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
0.89k
1.45k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
2.67k
3.97k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
2.18k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.6k
0.82k (x1.37)
TOTAL
5.68k
8.42k (x1.48)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
1.78k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
2.33k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
1.41k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
0.74k (x1.64)
TOTAL
4.79k
6.26k (x1.31)
Multithread
C-60
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.84k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
3.89k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.42k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
0.9k (x1.23)
TOTAL
8.53k
10.05k (x1.18)
Performance/W
C-60
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4