C Series C-60 vs A9 9420
Description
The C-60 is based on Bobcat architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 3.4 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the C-60 gets a score of 8.5 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 3.4 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
500f20
670f00
Core
Ontario
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.33 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FT1
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
9 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Date
August 2011
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
4.79k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.53k points
46.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
C-60
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
0.66k
2.56k (x3.89)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
9.97k (x5.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.11k
2.96k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.52k
2.12k (x4.1)
TOTAL
4.2k
17.61k (x4.2)
Multithread
C-60
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
0.89k
3.88k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
2.67k
9.26k (x3.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
3.9k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.6k
1.74k (x2.91)
TOTAL
5.68k
18.79k (x3.31)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
C-60
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1.32k
8.41k (x6.36)
Test#2 (FP)
1.94k
11.48k (x5.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.07k
3.29k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.45k
2.24k (x4.92)
TOTAL
4.79k
25.41k (x5.31)
Multithread
C-60
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
11.25k (x4.77)
Test#2 (FP)
3.52k
13.69k (x3.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.09k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.73k
1.87k (x2.55)
TOTAL
8.53k
28.89k (x3.39)
Performance/W
C-60
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
262 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
391 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
948 points/W
1926 points/W
Performance/GHz
C-60
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1461 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
3599 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4