Athlon 3000G vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
50657
Core
Picasso
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
November 2019
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
12.92k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
10.97k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
2.54k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
5.09k (x0.94)
TOTAL
43.82k
31.52k (x0.72)
Multithread
3000G
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
103.33k (x3.79)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
87.67k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
20.1k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.91k (x0.87)
TOTAL
95.84k
216.02k (x2.25)
Performance/W
3000G
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4