Athlon 3000G vs Core i7-7700HQ
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 2.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 2.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
208.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
23.27k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
20.35k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
7.92k (x1.46)
TOTAL
43.82k
56.29k (x1.28)
Multithread
3000G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
93.11k (x3.41)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
89.03k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
21.29k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.9k (x0.87)
TOTAL
95.84k
208.33k (x2.17)
Performance/W
3000G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
4629 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4