Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-8250U
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i5-8250U gets 161.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.7 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i5-8250U gets 161.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.7 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ea
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
54.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
161.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
22.11k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
19.64k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.54k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
8.03k (x1.48)
TOTAL
43.82k
54.31k (x1.24)
Multithread
3000G
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
74.19k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
66.27k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
15.97k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
4.83k (x0.86)
TOTAL
95.84k
161.26k (x1.68)
Performance/W
3000G
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
4418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1065 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
10751 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
6503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5777 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
15975 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4