Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-7300U
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i5-7300U gets 109.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i5-7300U gets 109.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
109.1k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
20.18k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
18.57k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
4.24k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
5.25k (x0.97)
TOTAL
43.82k
48.25k (x1.1)
Multithread
3000G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
47.75k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
44.82k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
10.82k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
5.7k (x1.02)
TOTAL
95.84k
109.1k (x1.14)
Performance/W
3000G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
3184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
2988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
380 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
7273 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5766 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1501 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
13785 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4