| | | | | | |

Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-4690


Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4690 is 1.7 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
163.95k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
22.97k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
13.02k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
5.21k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
4.74k (x0.87)
TOTAL
43.82k
45.95k (x1.05)

Multithread

3000G

i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
85.98k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
49.01k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
19.5k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
9.46k (x1.69)
TOTAL
95.84k
163.95k (x1.71)

Performance/W
3000G
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
1952 points/W

Performance/GHz
3000G
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4