Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-8145U
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.3 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.3 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806eb
Core
Picasso
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
75.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
17.78k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
12.8k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
2.61k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
1.3k (x0.24)
TOTAL
43.82k
34.48k (x0.79)
Multithread
3000G
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
28.06k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
34.83k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
9.69k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
2.55k (x0.46)
TOTAL
95.84k
75.13k (x0.78)
Performance/W
3000G
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
5008 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4