Athlon 3000G vs Core i3-7100U
Description
The 3000G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.2 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3000G gets a score of 95.8 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.2 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.82k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
95.84k points
79.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
13.46k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
20.56k
13.45k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.81k
3.08k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.43k
3.4k (x0.62)
TOTAL
43.82k
33.38k (x0.76)
Multithread
3000G
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.29k
34.95k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
49.37k
33.53k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.57k
7.74k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
3.38k (x0.6)
TOTAL
95.84k
79.6k (x0.83)
Performance/W
3000G
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
780 points/W
2330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/W
2235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
2738 points/W
5307 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1553 points/GHz
1415 points/GHz
TOTAL
12519 points/GHz
13909 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4